Breaking News
Home / LATEST NEWS / Brexit High Court Ruling: Lord Chancellor Backs The Judiciary Amid Row
British Lord Chancellor, Liz Truss.

Brexit High Court Ruling: Lord Chancellor Backs The Judiciary Amid Row

The Lord Chancellor has backed the independence of the UK’s judiciary but stopped short of condemning attacks on senior judges over the Brexit ruling.

The Bar Council had demanded Liz Truss respond to criticism from some MPs and newspapers over the decision that MPs should vote on triggering Article 50.

The Daily Mail branded judges:

“Enemies of the people”

the Daily Express said it was:

“the day democracy died”.

Ms Truss said the “impartiality” of the courts was “respected the world over”.

On Thursday, the High Court ruled Parliament should vote on when the government can trigger Article 50, beginning the formal process of the UK leaving the EU.

Three judges found that the government could not start the formal process by using the royal prerogative alone, and would need the backing of both the Commons and the Lords.

The government is seeking to overturn the decision at the Supreme Court – the UK’s highest court of appeal – next month.

Following fierce criticism of the ruling, the Bar Council of England and Wales called for Ms Truss – who as Lord Chancellor is responsible for courts, prisons, probation and constitutional affairs – to defend the judges.

In a statement on Saturday, the council – the professional body representing barristers – said it regretted “the lack of public statement by the Lord Chancellor condemning these attacks”.

It called on her to condemn them “as a matter of urgency”.

“A strong independent judiciary is essential to a functioning democracy and to upholding the rule of law,” it said.

In a statement issued later, Ms Truss, who is also the justice secretary, said: “The independence of the judiciary is the foundation upon which our rule of law is built and our judiciary is rightly respected the world over for its independence and impartiality.

“In relation to the case heard in the High Court, the government has made it clear it will appeal to the Supreme Court. Legal process must be followed.”

BBC political correspondent Ben Wright said the statement from Ms Truss would have been approved by Downing Street, but did not address the Bar Council’s call for her to condemn the criticism of the judges.

Our corresponded added that the Lord Chancellor’s response would have also upset some in the legal community because she did not say the government believed the courts had a right to consider the case.

‘Silence embarrassing’

Shadow justice secretary Richard Burgon, who had earlier said Ms Truss’s silence was “embarrassing”, called her statement “too little, much too late” and said she had failed to “adequately stand up to attacks on [the] judiciary”.

He said “pressure from the legal profession, professional bodies, politicians and the public has paid off” and Ms Truss had “finally made at least some progress on this issue”.

But he added: “All Liz Truss has done is recite the well-known principle of the independence of the judiciary…

“The last few days mean that much of the legal community now has no confidence in the Lord Chancellor to fulfil her statutory duty to protect the independence of the British judiciary.”

Writing on Twitter, Lib Dem leader Tim Farron described the response from Ms Truss as a “weak statement from a weak cabinet minister”.

Earlier, Tory MP and former Attorney-General, Dominic Grieve, has compared coverage in one UK newspaper to the Nazi party’s newspaper.

He told BBC Radio 5 live: “Newspapers in a free society can do what they like.

“But if you did decide to behave immoderately and whip up frenzied hatred you can do that in a free society if you set about it, and newspapers like the Daily Mail are no different from the Voelkischer Beobachter in Nazi Germany if they run headlines of that type.”

‘Decisive intervention’

Daily Mail columnist Stephen Glover defended his newspaper’s stance, saying he did not believe the judges would “feel frightened or worried” by the criticism.

He said they had made a “decisive intervention” in the political process, and “must expect some comeback”.

UKIP MP Douglas Carswell is among those who have attacked the judges, calling them “politicians without accountability”.

Meanwhile, Gina Miller, the investment manager and philanthropist who led the legal campaign, has said she plans to report online trolls to police after receiving rape and death threats.

“I am really cross at the politicians and the media who are whipping this up because they are the ones inciting racism and violence and acrimony,” she said.

Prime Minister Theresa May has said she is “confident” the government will win its Supreme Court appeal and is committed to triggering Article 50 by March 2017.

Source: BBC.

About Dr. Idris Ahmed

Dr. Idris Ahmed is the President and founder of the CUPS organisation. He is a Cryptologist (Mathematical science of designing and breaking computer security systems). He is the founder and Chief Executive officer of Tecomex Forensics Ltd (www.tecomex-forensics.com). He is passionate about fighting corruption, enhancing democracy, and establishing good governance in Nigeria. He is the Editor in Chief of the cupstv.com website.

Check Also

The crash in the pound punctures the delusion that Brexit Britain will flourish

For the most acute comment on the outlook for Brexit Britain, look neither to bankers …